It’s no secret to anyone who has followed my journey in board games that Scythe was a game I had high hopes for but ultimately struggled to enjoy. A close friend of mine had built it up to me as a game that could fundamentally change the way I viewed board games, and at the time, my experience with them was still quite limited. I wasn’t entirely sure what to expect, but the anticipation was high. The artwork, components, and general theme looked incredible, and I assumed that enjoying the game would be inevitable. I had this vision of being swept away by a game that promised strategic depth, aesthetic beauty, and replayability all at once.
The Disappointment That Followed
When I finally got the chance to play Scythe, the reality was vastly different from my expectations. Instead of a smooth, engaging experience, I found myself frustrated at nearly every turn. The mechanics felt restrictive, and it seemed like every move I tried to make was blocked by the actions of other players. My attempts to carve out my strategy were continually thwarted, leading to mounting frustration as the game went on. Ultimately, I lost to my friend, which was hardly surprising given his extensive experience and strategic skill, but the sense of powerlessness stuck with me.
Despite the frustration, I could see the visual appeal of the game and understood why others were drawn to it. In an attempt to give it another chance, I purchased the digital version. Unfortunately, the same issues persisted. The bots would block me repeatedly, and while the game looked fantastic, I still felt trapped in terms of what I could do on my turn. The digital version did nothing to alleviate the frustration that had colored my initial experience.
Understanding My Dislike for Area Control Mechanics
As I explored more games and developed my taste, I started to pinpoint the source of my frustration: the area control mechanic. I enjoy competitive games and often like mechanics that allow for “take that” interactions, but the constant tug-of-war over territory never appealed to me. Area control games can be immensely popular and are praised for their strategic depth, but they never quite fit my style of play. This realization helped me understand why my experience with Scythe had been so unsatisfying.
Looking ahead, I knew I would encounter area control in other games, such as Arcs, which I plan to review soon. From my early observations, the mechanic in that game seemed to operate differently, which gave me hope that my experience could be more enjoyable in future titles that employed area control more thoughtfully.
Appreciation for Stonemaier Games
Despite my issues with Scythe, I became a fan of Stonemaier Games as a publisher. I collected other games like Apiary and Wyrmspan, drawn to the quality, design philosophy, and transparency that Jamey Stegmaier and his team maintain in producing their games. While not every game suited my tastes, I valued the honesty and thoughtfulness that went into their design and business practices. Their approach to running a board game company—transparent communication, openness with players, and attention to quality—stood out in an industry that can sometimes feel opaque.
When I came across an article by Jamey about their approach to reviews and content creators, I was intrigued. At that time, I was relatively new to blogging and didn’t think my reach was sufficient to apply for a content creator program, but I filed the information away for future reference, recognizing the potential opportunity.
Becoming a Content Creator and Receiving Review Copies
A few months later, as my blog grew in subscribers and engagement, I felt confident enough to start requesting review copies. I submitted applications for several games, thinking little of it, fully expecting that my smaller blog would not be of interest to Stonemaier Games. To my surprise, I received an email offering review copies of multiple titles. The feeling was thrilling. Receiving recognition from a company I admired triggered a mix of excitement and imposter syndrome. It validated the work I had put into my blog and gave me the chance to contribute meaningfully to the board gaming community.
Choosing Expeditions for Review
Selecting the game to review required careful consideration. Given my previous experience with Scythe, I knew I would approach a game from the same universe with a slightly critical perspective. I wanted to be as unbiased as possible, but personal experiences inevitably shape one’s initial impressions. After reviewing the options, I chose Expeditions for several reasons:
First, the connection to the Scythe universe meant I would naturally bring a critical lens to the review, providing a balance against overly positive bias. Second, I was genuinely intrigued by the theme and mechanical innovations in Expeditions. It felt different enough to stand on its own, promising an experience distinct from my frustrating encounters with Scythe. Finally, the other options either required owning a base game I did not have or simply did not appeal to me, making Expeditions the most practical and exciting choice.
It’s important to note that the copy I received was provided for review purposes. My opinions are my own and were not influenced by the publisher. This allowed me to approach the review with an honest perspective and evaluate the game critically based on my own experiences and preferences.
Exploring the Box and Components
Opening the box for Expeditions was an experience in itself. The size of the box immediately stood out, taller than most of the other games in my collection. The artwork by Jakub Rozalski on the cover set the tone for the game, depicting an alternative history version of 1920s Soviet Russia with steampunk elements and a mysterious metallic mountain at the center. The design evoked curiosity and hinted at a game focused on exploration and discovery.
Inside, the box contained a well-thought-out insert designed for both functionality and storage. The insert allowed for easy organization of the various pieces, including additional expansion components, without causing clutter or setup issues. As someone who values efficient and thoughtful component design, this feature immediately impressed me.
The components themselves were of high quality. The rulebooks and cards featured a linen finish, adding a tactile and visual premium feel. The mechs were detailed and robust, accompanied by boards, hex tiles, and numerous tokens that would support gameplay. There were even additional elements, like mech board riser stickers, to facilitate smoother play and enhance overall usability. Every aspect of the box conveyed careful consideration and attention to detail, creating a sense of anticipation before the game even began.
First Impressions and Setup
The first time I set up Expeditions, I was struck by how organized and user-friendly the components were. The insert made a difference in keeping everything neat, and I appreciated the attention to detail in labeling all the different pieces. The variable map setup was intriguing because it offered a fresh experience every time I played. Unlike some other games where the map remains static, the flexibility here added a layer of excitement. I also noticed that the player boards and mech boards had a level of clarity that made the gameplay flow smoother from the start. Even the cards and tokens were easy to distinguish, which is a subtle but important factor in keeping a game enjoyable.
One thing I noticed immediately was how the rules were written. The main rulebook and the solo rulebook both had clear instructions with examples that made understanding the mechanics less daunting. This is a common hurdle for many complex board games, but Expeditions did a good job in balancing detailed explanations with readability. The linen finish on the cards and books made handling them a pleasant tactile experience, which, although minor, adds to the overall enjoyment of opening and playing a game.
First Playthrough and Strategy
During my first playthrough, I found myself quickly drawn into the alternate history theme. The setting of 1920s Soviet Russia, combined with steampunk elements, provided a rich backdrop that was both intriguing and immersive. Unlike some games where the theme feels tacked on, here it was integral to the experience, and that motivated me to engage with the game on a deeper level. I also appreciated that the game did not rely solely on luck. While card draws and dice rolls had their place, the strategic choices were the most important factor in determining the outcome of the game.
Initially, I struggled to find my footing in terms of strategy. The game requires careful planning, and making mistakes can be costly. However, the structure of Expeditions encourages experimentation. Each turn allows multiple paths forward, whether focusing on area control, gathering resources, or completing objectives. I found that exploring different strategies kept the game fresh and exciting. The feeling of discovery was enhanced by the dynamic board setup and the variety of objectives players could pursue.
I also noticed that, compared to some other games, the level of player interaction was balanced. You are aware of other players’ moves and can plan accordingly, but the game does not revolve solely around blocking opponents. This was a refreshing change from my previous experiences with area control-heavy games, where frustration often overshadowed enjoyment. Here, the interaction felt strategic rather than punitive, and that made the competitive aspect far more satisfying.
Components and Artwork
One of the standout features of Expeditions is its artwork and component quality. Jakub Rozalski’s illustrations are stunning and fully capture the alternative history setting. The cover alone is impressive, but opening the box reveals an even more detailed and immersive visual experience. From the mechs to the player boards, every element has been crafted with care. The quality of the components enhances the overall feel of the game, making it more than just a strategic exercise but also a visually rewarding experience.
The miniatures for the mechs were particularly noteworthy. They have intricate details that are uncommon for standard board games and provide a sense of immersion that enhances gameplay. I also appreciated the functional aspects of the components, such as the mech riser stickers and colored bases, which make managing player pieces easier. This thoughtful design demonstrates the designer’s attention to both aesthetics and usability, which is something that can often be overlooked in game development.
The cards, with their linen finish, add to the premium feel of the game. They are easy to shuffle and handle, and the art on each card ties seamlessly into the theme. The resource tokens and cubes are also well-made, sturdy enough to last through repeated play. These physical elements may seem minor compared to mechanics, but they contribute significantly to player satisfaction and overall enjoyment.
Gameplay Mechanics and Flow
The gameplay mechanics of Expeditions are complex yet intuitive once you understand the flow. The game revolves around exploration, resource management, and achieving objectives while adapting to the ever-changing board setup. One of the features I particularly enjoyed was the modularity of the map. Every game felt different because of the variable map tiles and randomized objectives, which prevented the game from feeling repetitive.
The game also integrates strategic planning with tactical decision-making. You need to balance long-term goals, such as acquiring resources and expanding territory, with short-term actions, like responding to opponent moves and maximizing your turn. This balance keeps players engaged and constantly thinking ahead. Unlike some other competitive games where one mistake can feel punishing, Expeditions allows room for recovery and adaptation, which is a big plus in terms of overall enjoyment.
I noticed that the way the game handles player turns is also well-considered. Each turn feels meaningful because players have multiple options to consider, but there is no excessive downtime between turns. This keeps the pace of the game engaging and maintains interest throughout. The interaction between players, while present, is not overwhelming, and the game encourages strategic thinking rather than aggressive blocking or frustration tactics.
Another key aspect of the mechanics is how exploration is handled. Players are rewarded for venturing into new areas and completing objectives, which creates a sense of progression and accomplishment. The game successfully balances risk and reward, making strategic decisions impactful without being overly punishing. This is a stark contrast to some of my past experiences, where frustration from blocked moves overshadowed any enjoyment.
Solo Play Experience
One feature I found particularly appealing was the solo mode. Many complex board games struggle to offer a satisfying single-player experience, but Expeditions succeeds in this regard. The solo rules are clear, and the game scales well to a one-player scenario without losing depth or strategic complexity. Playing solo allowed me to experiment with different strategies without the pressure of competition, which helped me understand the game mechanics more thoroughly.
Solo play also highlighted the design quality and attention to detail. The AI or automated opponent system provided a challenging yet fair experience. It forced me to think critically about each move and adapt to changing conditions, similar to how I would need to respond to human opponents. This balance made solo play enjoyable rather than repetitive or predictable. I could see this mode being particularly useful for new players who want to learn the game mechanics before competing against others.
Personal Reflections and Comparisons
Reflecting on my experience with Expeditions, I realized that my initial frustrations with other games were largely due to personal preference for certain mechanics. While I had previously struggled with area control-heavy games, Expeditions offered a more balanced and engaging approach. The game combines exploration, strategy, and resource management in a way that keeps players invested without feeling overly punitive.
Compared to my earlier experiences, the level of polish and thoughtful design in Expeditions stood out. The components, artwork, and rulebooks all contribute to a premium gaming experience, while the mechanics offer depth and replayability. Even though the game is tied to a universe I previously had mixed feelings about, it managed to engage me in a way that was both enjoyable and satisfying.
The alternate history theme is another aspect that resonated with me. Unlike games that have a theme added superficially, Expeditions weaves the narrative into the gameplay. The world-building, combined with the steampunk elements, creates a setting that is intriguing and immersive. This integration of theme and mechanics makes each decision feel meaningful and adds layers to the strategic experience.
Learning Curve and Replayability
Expeditions has a moderate learning curve, which is manageable thanks to the well-written rulebooks and clear examples. New players may take a few turns to fully grasp the nuances of the game, but the overall structure allows for gradual learning. Unlike some games that feel overwhelming at first, Expeditions eases players into the mechanics while keeping the gameplay engaging.
Replayability is another strong point. The combination of variable maps, different objectives, and multiple strategies ensures that each playthrough is unique. Players can approach the game in different ways, whether focusing on resource accumulation, strategic positioning, or completing specific objectives. This variety keeps the game fresh and encourages experimentation, which adds long-term value to the experience.
Understanding the Core Mechanics
As I delved deeper into Expeditions, I realized that mastering the core mechanics was crucial to improving performance. While the first playthrough focused on learning the rules and familiarizing myself with the components, subsequent games emphasized understanding resource management, exploration, and objective planning. The interplay between collecting resources, moving mechs, and completing missions requires careful thought, and each decision can significantly impact the outcome of the game.
One important aspect of strategy is prioritizing actions based on immediate needs versus long-term goals. Early in the game, I focused on securing essential resources and exploring key areas that would give me flexibility later. Understanding the optimal placement of mechs and how to leverage the unique abilities of each faction was also a turning point. By combining careful positioning with strategic resource allocation, I was able to execute more efficient turns and increase my chances of success.
Planning for Objectives
Objectives are at the heart of the gameplay, and focusing on them can make the difference between winning and losing. Each objective has specific requirements, and some offer more rewards than others. Part of the challenge lies in assessing which objectives are feasible given your current resources, positioning, and the actions of opponents. I found that setting short-term goals that aligned with my overall strategy made it easier to progress without overextending.
Another critical factor is anticipating how opponents will interact with objectives. Since multiple players can compete for the same goals, it’s important to evaluate which objectives are likely to remain accessible and which might be contested. This requires not only tracking your resources but also observing other players’ actions and adapting accordingly. By doing so, I was able to avoid wasted moves and focus on areas where I could achieve the most value.
Resource Management
Efficient resource management is a key element of strategic play. In Expeditions, resources are limited, and the choices you make about how to spend them can have lasting consequences. Early on, I noticed that hoarding resources without a clear plan often led to missed opportunities, while spending too aggressively could leave me vulnerable in later turns. The key is finding a balance between accumulation and utilization.
I also learned that the timing of resource usage matters. For example, certain actions yield maximum benefit when executed at specific points in the game. Understanding when to deploy mechs, trade resources, or complete objectives can significantly improve outcomes. Additionally, keeping an eye on the overall board state helps in predicting when certain resources will become scarce, allowing me to plan more effectively. This strategic depth adds a layer of complexity that makes each decision feel meaningful and engaging.
Tactical Movement and Mech Placement
Movement and positioning are fundamental aspects of tactical decision-making. Mechs are not just tools for exploration—they are critical for controlling key areas, completing objectives, and responding to opponent moves. During my playthroughs, I experimented with different placement strategies to see how they influenced gameplay. Positioning mechs near high-value objectives or resource-rich areas often provided a strong advantage, but overcommitting in one region could leave other parts of the board exposed.
I also discovered that flexible movement planning is essential. The game’s modular board and dynamic objectives mean that conditions change with every turn. Anticipating opponent actions and leaving room for adjustment allowed me to react to unexpected developments. In several games, I found that minor tweaks in movement or mech placement made a significant difference in my ability to achieve objectives and maximize points.
Balancing Risk and Reward
Expeditions thrive on the balance between risk and reward. Certain actions offer high potential gains but come with inherent risks, while others provide steady but smaller benefits. Learning to evaluate this trade-off was a critical aspect of my strategy development. Early in the game, I tended to play cautiously, avoiding risky maneuvers in favor of securing reliable objectives. Over time, however, I realized that calculated risks often led to greater rewards and helped me stay ahead of opponents.
One example of risk management involves venturing into unexplored territories. While exploration can uncover valuable resources and objectives, it also exposes mechs to potential setbacks. By carefully considering the probability of success versus potential loss, I was able to make informed decisions that enhanced my overall strategy. This delicate balance between risk and reward keeps each game exciting and ensures that strategic thinking remains central to gameplay.
Interactions with Opponents
Player interaction is subtle but significant. Unlike some competitive games where blocking and direct conflict dominate, Expeditions emphasizes strategic observation and timing. Watching opponents’ moves and anticipating their plans allows for more informed decisions. I often found myself adjusting my strategy not because of aggressive interference but to maximize efficiency and avoid unnecessary conflict.
Another aspect of player interaction is competition for limited resources and objectives. This adds tension without creating frustration. Knowing when to compete for an objective versus pursuing a safer path is part of the strategic depth that makes the game engaging. Over time, I developed a sense of when to push aggressively and when to focus on my long-term strategy, which improved both my performance and enjoyment.
Scoring and Maximizing Points
Scoring in Expeditions is multifaceted, with points coming from objectives, controlled areas, completed missions, and resource management. Understanding how each action contributes to scoring is crucial. Early games focused on completing objectives, but I soon realized that combining multiple sources of points often yielded better results. For example, securing an area with a high-value objective while collecting associated resources provided a compound advantage that accelerated my progress.
Planning for endgame scoring also became a vital part of strategy. I learned to keep track of potential scoring opportunities that might arise in later turns and to position myself accordingly. By maintaining flexibility and monitoring both my progress and that of opponents, I was able to maximize points without overextending. This approach reinforced the importance of forward-thinking and strategic foresight in every decision I made.
Advanced Strategic Techniques
As I gained experience, I experimented with more advanced techniques to enhance my gameplay. One method involved prioritizing objectives that synergized with my faction’s abilities. Each faction has unique strengths, and leveraging these effectively can create powerful advantages. Aligning actions with faction abilities allows for more efficient turns and often provides opportunities that opponents may not anticipate.
Another technique involved controlling key areas of the board to create pressure on opponents. By holding strategic positions, I could influence their movement and choices without confrontation. This type of indirect interaction requires careful planning and foresight, but it can be highly effective in gaining a competitive edge.
I also explored different approaches to resource allocation, such as focusing on early accumulation to enable high-impact actions later in the game. Timing these actions correctly can create significant momentum, which is often decisive in tight games. Learning to recognize the optimal moments for executing key strategies was a major factor in improving my overall performance.
Adapting to Different Player Counts
Expeditions is designed to accommodate different numbers of players, and strategy must adapt accordingly. In two-player games, the focus often shifts to head-to-head competition, where each move has a more direct impact on the opponent. With more players, the dynamics change, and unpredictability increases. In these scenarios, flexibility and careful observation become even more critical.
I noticed that adapting the strategy based on player count enhances both enjoyment and competitiveness. The game scales well, offering challenges that are appropriate for the number of participants. Whether playing solo, with two players, or in larger groups, the balance between strategy, interaction, and risk management remains engaging. Learning to adjust tactics based on the number of opponents added another layer of depth to my experience.
Long-Term Strategy Development
Over multiple playthroughs, I developed a sense of long-term strategy that integrated resource management, objectives, movement, and interaction. Rather than reacting turn by turn, I began to plan several moves, considering both immediate gains and future opportunities. This approach made the gameplay feel more cohesive and allowed for more deliberate, calculated decisions.
I also learned that maintaining flexibility is essential. While long-term planning is valuable, the dynamic nature of the board and the unpredictability of opponents’ actions require constant adaptation. Balancing foresight with responsiveness ensures that strategic plans remain effective, and it keeps the game engaging across multiple sessions.
Personal Reflections on Mastery
Mastering Expeditions is a gradual process, but it is highly rewarding. The combination of strategy, tactical decision-making, and player interaction creates a rich and immersive experience. Each game provides new challenges and opportunities to refine approaches, making it both engaging and educational. I found that the game encourages critical thinking, planning, and adaptability, skills that extend beyond the gaming table.
Compared to my earlier experiences with complex board games, Expeditions strikes a balance between depth and accessibility. While the learning curve can be steep initially, the clarity of rules, quality of components, and strategic possibilities make the effort worthwhile. Over time, the sense of mastery and accomplishment grows, providing long-term satisfaction and replayability.
Conclusion
Expeditions offers a sophisticated yet accessible strategy experience. By understanding the core mechanics, prioritizing objectives, managing resources efficiently, and mastering movement and positioning, players can develop advanced tactics that enhance gameplay. The balance of risk and reward, subtle player interaction, and multi-faceted scoring system create a dynamic and engaging environment.
Whether playing solo or with multiple players, the game rewards careful planning, adaptability, and strategic thinking. Over time, I found that my skills improved significantly as I experimented with different strategies, adapted to opponent behavior, and refined long-term plans. The combination of thematic immersion, strategic depth, and replayability makes Expeditions a standout experience in the modern board gaming landscape.